Updated for 2025/26

IR35 Guide for Contractors

Everything a UK Ltd contractor needs to understand IR35 — the three-limb test, the latest Supreme Court rulings, how client size affects who decides your status, and how Nebula automates your compliance.

Last reviewed June 2026Hiep Do, FCCA, MSc25 min read

Key IR35 Numbers

3Core limbs — personal service, control, and terms consistent with employment
20+HMRC employment status indicators reviewed in a full IR35 assessment
£50kSmall company turnover threshold — below this, you determine your own IR35 status (private sector)
2024PGMOL Supreme Court ruling — fundamentally changed how Mutuality of Obligation is assessed
Regulatory notice: Nebula provides software and AI-assisted guidance — not regulated financial advice. For complex IR35 disputes, consult a qualified tax adviser.

Important: Nebula Finance provides accounting software and AI-assisted guidance. It does not provide regulated financial advice. The content of this guide is for information purposes only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. For complex IR35 disputes, an active HMRC enquiry, or situations involving significant financial exposure, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. IR35 determinations are highly fact-specific — the principles in this guide are a starting point, not a substitute for professional review.

What is IR35?

IR35 — formally known as the Intermediaries Legislation (Chapter 8, ITEPA 2003 for private sector; Chapter 10 for off-payroll working) — is a set of tax rules that prevents workers from avoiding employment taxes by operating through a limited company when, in substance, they work like employees.

The name comes from the Inland Revenue press release numbered 35, issued in the 2000 Budget. More than two decades later, it remains one of the most contentious and litigated areas of UK tax law.

In practice, IR35 asks a single question: if the worker were engaged directly by the end client — with no limited company in between — would that engagement look like employment? If the answer is yes, the worker is “inside IR35” and subject to PAYE income tax and National Insurance on their earnings from that engagement. If the answer is no, they are “outside IR35” and entitled to the tax efficiencies that come with operating through a Ltd company.

The core distinction

Inside IR35: Your Ltd company fees from the engagement are treated as deemed employment income — subject to PAYE and NICs before you can take them as salary or dividends.

Outside IR35: Your Ltd company is genuinely contracting, and you can extract income in the tax-efficient way a business owner is entitled to — salary up to threshold, dividends on remaining profits, pension contributions, allowable expenses.

Who Does IR35 Apply To?

IR35 applies where all of the following are true:

  • A worker provides services to a client
  • Those services are provided through an intermediary — typically a Ltd company (Personal Service Company / PSC), but also partnerships and managed service companies
  • If the worker were engaged directly by the client, the relationship would resemble employment

It applies to:

  • IT contractors, management consultants, engineers, financial services contractors, and other professional services contractors operating through a PSC
  • Public sector workers in scope have been subject to off-payroll rules since April 2017
  • Private and voluntary sector workers in scope have been subject to the off-payroll rules (Chapter 10) since April 2021

It does not apply to:

  • Sole traders (who are assessed differently under employment status rules)
  • Workers where there is a genuine third-party managed service or Statement of Works relationship
  • Workers engaged by small private-sector clients (who use the original Chapter 8 rules — see Client Size & Liability)

The Three-Limb Test (Ready Mixed Concrete, 1968)

Every IR35 determination begins with the Ready Mixed Concrete test, established by MacKenna J in 1968 and still the starting point for every tribunal and HMRC enquiry today. A contract can only be one of employment if all three limbs are satisfied:

Personal Service

The worker must provide the services personally. A genuine, unfettered right of substitution — where the worker can send someone else without the client's approval — typically defeats this limb.

Outside pointer: real substitution right

Control

The client must exercise sufficient control over how, when, and where the work is done — not just what the end result is. Post-PGMOL (2024), a contractual framework granting authority to the client is sufficient — actual day-to-day direction is not required.

Inside pointer: client controls method

Employment-Consistent Terms

All other terms and the overall character of the engagement must be consistent with a contract of employment rather than a business relationship. Financial risk, equipment, integration, and "in business on own account" all factor here.

Outside pointer: genuine financial risk

If any one of the three limbs cannot be satisfied, the engagement cannot be a contract of employment — and IR35 does not apply. In practice, the analysis rarely stops at the limbs: tribunals apply a holistic “overall picture” test (confirmed in Kickabout Productions, 2022) once the limbs have been assessed.

The Four-Step Modern Approach

Since the Court of Appeal's ruling in Atholl House (Kaye Adams) and the Supreme Court in PGMOL (2024), tribunals apply a four-step methodology:

  1. Identify the real terms of the engagement — applying Autoclenz principles to look past contract wording to the actual working reality
  2. Apply the Ready Mixed Concrete limbs
  3. Construct the hypothetical direct contract — what would the engagement look like with no PSC in between?
  4. Determine whether that hypothetical contract would be employment, looking at the whole picture

Employment Status Factors

Within the three-limb framework, tribunals and HMRC assessors weigh a range of specific factors. The table below summarises the most significant — note that no single factor is determinative: all must be weighed together.

FactorPoints Inside IR35Points Outside IR35Weight (post-2024)
Right of substitutionClient approval required; right never used; substitute must be worker's employeeGenuine, unfettered right; any suitably qualified person acceptable; actually exercisedHigh
ControlClient dictates how work is done; attendance required; managed alongside employees; framework contract grants authorityWorker controls method; outcomes-based contract; no supervision over day-to-day tasksVery High
Mutuality of ObligationOngoing expectation of work; client obliged to provide tasks; worker expected to accept new tasks automaticallyDiscrete project with defined deliverable and clear end point; no obligation beyond specific task (post-PGMOL caveat: basic offer/accept is always present)Medium
Financial riskFixed daily rate; no financial exposure if work is deficient; no own equipmentFixed-price deliverables; responsible for remediation cost; uses own equipment and softwareHigh
IntegrationRostered alongside employees; given company email; attends internal team meetings and appraisals; included in org chartClearly external; separate systems; not included in internal management processesHigh
Multiple clientsFinancially dependent on a single client; no other business activityGenuine portfolio of clients; demonstrable business activity beyond one engagementMedium
ExclusivityContractual exclusivity or practical inability to work elsewhereFree to accept other work during the engagement; no exclusivity clauseMedium
Provision of equipmentClient provides all tools, hardware, software, and office spaceWorker provides own equipment and working environmentMedium-Low
Contract lengthOpen-ended or rolling extensions of indefinite durationFixed-term tied to specific deliverable; clear end dateLow-Medium
Employee benefitsReceives holiday pay, sick pay, pension contributions from clientNo employee-like benefits; entirely self-fundingLow

Post-PGMOL caution on Mutuality

Before the September 2024 Supreme Court ruling in PGMOL v HMRC, contractors could often argue that the absence of ongoing obligations to offer and accept work defeated Mutuality of Obligation entirely. The Supreme Court has significantly narrowed this route. Basic mutuality — an offer of work and its acceptance — is always present in any engagement where payment flows. The argument that a short-term engagement has no MoO is no longer viable on its own. You still need to assess control, substitution, and the wider picture.

Client Size and Who Bears Liability

One of the most practically important IR35 questions for contractors is: who decides my status, and who bears the liability if they get it wrong? The answer depends entirely on the size of the end client.

Small Private-Sector Client

Chapter 8 rules (original IR35)

  • You (the worker/PSC) decide your own IR35 status
  • You bear the liability if wrong
  • No obligation on client to issue a Status Determination Statement
  • Small = meets 2 of 3: turnover ≤ £10.2m, balance sheet ≤ £5.1m, employees ≤ 50
  • From April 2025: thresholds increase to turnover ≤ £15m, balance sheet ≤ £7.5m

Medium/Large Private Sector or Public Sector

Chapter 10 off-payroll working rules

  • Client is responsible for determining IR35 status
  • Client must issue a Status Determination Statement (SDS) with reasons
  • Fee payer (client or agency) deducts PAYE and NICs before payment if inside
  • Liability can shift back to client if they fail to take reasonable care
  • PAYE set-off applies from April 2024 — previously paid taxes offset against liability on enquiry

Identifying Your Client's Size

Before starting an engagement, confirm your client's legal size. Ask directly and request written confirmation. A client who is borderline or recently crossed a threshold may be uncertain — do not assume. Misidentifying client size is a compliance risk that sits with you.

From April 2025, the Companies Act thresholds that determine “small” increase for financial years starting on or after 6 April 2025. The impact on off-payroll status for most clients flows through with a delay — HMRC uses the last filed accounts and a two-year test, meaning for most clients the earliest practical impact is the 2027/28 tax year.

The Chain of Liability

Under Chapter 10, the liability chain runs: End Client → Agency (if any) → Fee Payer. If an end client fails to take reasonable care in their determination, or fails to issue an SDS, the liability remains with them rather than flowing down the chain. From 2026, umbrella company rules also impose joint and several liability across the supply chain for unpaid PAYE — if your umbrella fails to pay the correct tax, HMRC can pursue any party in the chain.

Status Determination Statements and CEST

Status Determination Statement (SDS)

Where Chapter 10 applies (medium/large private sector or public sector), the end client must issue a written SDS before payments are made. The SDS must:

  • State whether the worker is inside or outside IR35
  • Set out the reasons for that determination — not merely a conclusion
  • Be provided to both the worker and the next party in the chain (e.g., the agency)

If a client issues an SDS without adequate reasons, or refuses to engage with a dispute, the liability shifts to the client. Workers have the right to dispute an SDS — the client must respond within 45 days with either a new determination or an explanation of why they are standing by the original.

HMRC's CEST Tool

HMRC's Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool is available at tax.service.gov.uk/check-employment-status-for-tax. HMRC has committed to stand behind outcomes produced by CEST provided accurate information is input — making it a valuable tool for demonstrating reasonable care.

CEST limitations

CEST has been repeatedly criticised for not including explicit Mutuality of Obligation questions. The April 2025 refresh of CEST did not address this. CEST does not address all relevant factors and may produce “unable to determine” outputs in borderline cases. An outside CEST result is useful evidence — but it is not conclusive and should be supplemented with a full documented assessment.

Key Case Law: 2024 and 2025

The past two years have produced some of the most significant IR35 and employment status case law since the legislation was introduced. The clear pattern: HMRC is winning, and arguments that previously offered a route outside IR35 are being systematically closed off.

PGMOL v HMRC — Supreme Court
Supreme Court | September 2024
HMRC wins

Football referees working for the Professional Game Match Officials Ltd were found to be employees for tax purposes. The Supreme Court held that basic mutuality — the offer and acceptance of work — was sufficient to satisfy the MoO limb. The absence of an obligation to offer or accept future engagements does not defeat mutuality within the individual engagement itself.

Takeaway for contractors: “No mutuality” is no longer a standalone route outside IR35. Control and substitution are now the primary battlegrounds. Every IR35 position that previously rested heavily on the absence of MoO needs to be reassessed.
S & L Barnes Ltd (Stuart Barnes) v HMRC — Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal | 2024
HMRC wins on appeal

The Sky Sports rugby pundit initially won at First-tier Tribunal, which focused heavily on his real-world working practices. The Upper Tribunal reversed on appeal — placing far greater weight on Sky's contractual rights: first call on his services, control over scheduling and appearances. Contractual terms trumped practical reality.

Takeaway: The contractual terms matter enormously. Even if your working reality is flexible, client rights baked into the contract — particularly scheduling control and right-of-first-call — can tip a determination inside.
George Mantides Ltd v HMRC — Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal | April 2025
HMRC wins

A consultant urologist working as a locum through a PSC for two NHS trusts was found inside IR35 for one engagement. The tribunal found sufficient mutuality from the moment sessions were booked and carried out — even on a short-term, terminable basis. Clinical rota structures and integration into trust operations pointed to employment.

Takeaway: Short-term or rolling engagements do not automatically create weak mutuality. If work is offered and accepted on a regular basis, that pattern can establish sufficient MoO even without formal guarantees of future work.
Bryan Robson Ltd v HMRC — First-tier Tribunal
First-tier Tribunal | 2024/25
Mixed result

The former footballer's ambassadorial work for Manchester United (event attendance, executive box visits, matchday appearances) was found inside IR35 — characterised as employment-like integration. However, a portion of fees attributed to image rights was found outside IR35, as genuine commercial exploitation of personal brand rather than personal service.

Takeaway: Integration into a client's operational activities — rostering, management, regular attendance — is a strong inside pointer. Separate, distinct revenue streams (genuine image rights, IP licensing) can be carved out and assessed separately.
Atholl House Productions Ltd (Kaye Adams) — Final FTT
First-tier Tribunal (post-remittal) | 2024
Contractor wins

After years of litigation and multiple rounds of appeal, the BBC presenter again prevailed. The FTT found substantial autonomy over her work, a varied income base across multiple clients, and genuine control over the content she produced. A long relationship with a single broadcaster does not automatically create IR35 employment — the quality of the relationship matters.

Takeaway: Genuine autonomy over the work product, a real wider business, and multiple income streams remain powerful indicators of self-employment. Duration of relationship alone is not determinative.

How to Strengthen an Outside IR35 Position

Based on the current case law and HMRC guidance, the strongest outside-IR35 positions share a consistent set of characteristics. None of these alone guarantees a favourable determination — each engagement must be assessed on its specific facts — but all are worth building into your working practices and contracts.

Contractual protections

  • Genuine right of substitution: Drafted as a real commercial right, not a theoretical clause. The client should be unable to veto a suitably qualified substitute. Document any time the right has been used or offered.
  • Project-based scoping: Define the engagement around a specific deliverable with a clear start and end — not open-ended services. Include a defined scope of work.
  • No exclusivity clause: You should be free to work with other clients. Any clause restricting this will be scrutinised.
  • Financial risk provisions: Fixed-price elements, warranty or remediation obligations at your cost, and responsibility for own insurance all support a business-to-business character.

Practical working arrangements

  • Control over method: You decide how the work is done. Outcomes and deliverables are agreed; the route to them is yours to determine.
  • Own equipment: Use your own hardware, software licences, and professional tools where possible.
  • Not integrated into client operations: Avoid being given a client email address, appearing on internal org charts, being included in performance appraisals, or attending internal social events as a matter of course.
  • Multiple clients: Maintain a genuine portfolio of clients. Financial dependence on one client is a significant inside pointer.

Documentation and audit trail

  • Conduct a documented IR35 assessment at the start of each engagement — and update it when terms or working practices change
  • Retain all contracts, correspondence, and working records that evidence the nature of the relationship
  • Use CEST as one data point — but supplement with a fuller analysis
  • Consider professional IR35 insurance if you are borderline

Run your IR35 assessment with Orion

Nebula's Orion assessment automates this process — scoring 20+ HMRC indicators against your specific engagement terms, producing an explainable determination with cited HMRC manual references, and maintaining a full audit trail. Run your assessment below.

Run your IR35 assessment

Get a barrister-grade verdict in minutes — scored against all five HMRC factors and reviewed by Orion.

Run your IR35 assessment
Explainable AI determinationsHMRC manual citationsFull audit trailDynamic updates on contract change

If You Are Inside IR35

An inside-IR35 determination does not mean the engagement cannot proceed — but it does mean the tax treatment changes materially.

What changes

  • For medium/large or public sector clients: the fee payer (client or agency) deducts PAYE income tax and NICs before paying your Ltd company. Your Ltd receives a net payment.
  • For small private-sector clients: your Ltd company must account for a “deemed salary” through RTI, deducting PAYE and NICs and paying these to HMRC.
  • The deemed salary broadly equals your gross fee income from the engagement, less a 5% expense allowance (the Chapter 8 allowance — removed from Chapter 10 in 2021) and any allowable pension contributions.

PAYE set-off (from April 2024)

A significant 2024 reform: where HMRC pursues a fee payer or client for unpaid PAYE following a challenge, previously paid taxes — Corporation Tax on profits, and dividend taxes — can now be offset against the PAYE liability. This ends the double-taxation issue that was one of the most severe financial consequences of an inside IR35 finding. Penalties, however, still apply to the gross figure.

Challenging an inside determination

If you receive an inside-IR35 Status Determination Statement from a client that you believe is wrong:

  1. Request the written SDS with full reasons within 45 days of the determination
  2. Submit a formal dispute, providing evidence supporting an outside position
  3. The client must respond within 45 days — either issuing a revised SDS or confirming the original with reasons
  4. If unresolved, you can escalate to HMRC and, ultimately, to tribunal

Always seek professional advice before challenging a determination — the process has formal procedural requirements, and a poorly constructed dispute can weaken your position.

Related: MTD ITSA Explained

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax — Brief Summary

IR35 and MTD for ITSA often affect the same people — particularly contractors with sole-trader income alongside their Ltd company work, or those transitioning between trading structures. Here is what you need to know.

What is MTD for ITSA?

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self Assessment (MTD ITSA) replaces the annual Self Assessment tax return for eligible sole traders and landlords with a system of quarterly digital updates submitted via HMRC-compatible software, followed by an End of Period Statement and a Final Declaration.

Phase 1 — Live Now
6 April 2026
Income threshold: Over £50,000
Assessed using 2024/25 Self Assessment return
Phase 2
6 April 2027
Income threshold: Over £30,000
Assessed using 2025/26 Self Assessment return
Phase 3
6 April 2028
Income threshold: Over £20,000
Assessed using 2026/27 Self Assessment return

Who is in scope?

MTD ITSA applies to sole traders and landlords registered for Self Assessment. Qualifying income is gross turnover from self-employment and/or property — PAYE employment income, dividends, pensions, and investment income do not count towards the threshold. Ltd company directors receiving only salary and dividends from their company are not in scope under MTD ITSA.

Quarterly deadlines (2026/27)

QuarterPeriodSubmission Deadline
Q16 Apr – 5 Jul 20267 August 2026
Q26 Jul – 5 Oct 20267 November 2026
Q36 Oct – 5 Jan 20277 February 2027
Q46 Jan – 5 Apr 20277 May 2027
Final DeclarationFull year31 January 2028

Penalties

MTD ITSA uses a points-based penalty system. Each missed submission earns one penalty point. Reaching four points triggers a £200 financial penalty. Points expire after 12 months of full compliance. Note: Phase 1 has a grace period for quarterly submissions in 2026/27 — but the Final Declaration deadline of 31 January 2028 carries full penalty points from day one.

Frequently asked questions

The questions contractors ask us most about the rules covered in this guide — mutuality after PGMOL, who decides your status, disputing an SDS, and how IR35 sits alongside MTD for ITSA.

Did the PGMOL Supreme Court ruling change Mutuality of Obligation?

Yes. In PGMOL v HMRC (2024) the Supreme Court confirmed that the basic 'work-for-pay' bargain — an obligation to do the work in return for payment — exists in almost every engagement, including individual short assignments. That means the simple argument 'there is no mutuality of obligation between assignments' rarely succeeds on its own any more. Mutuality is now better treated as a low bar that is usually met; the real battleground has shifted to control and whether the worker is genuinely in business on their own account.

What is the difference between Chapter 8 and Chapter 10, and who decides my IR35 status?

Chapter 8 (ITEPA 2003) is the original IR35 regime where your own limited company assesses status and accounts for any deemed salary. Chapter 10 is the 'off-payroll working' regime: when your end client is a medium or large business, the client must assess your status, issue a Status Determination Statement, and the fee payer (often the agency) deducts PAYE if you are inside. If your end client is a small company in the private sector, you stay under Chapter 8 and decide your own status.

What counts as a 'small company' so I assess my own IR35 status?

A private-sector client is 'small' if it meets at least two of the three Companies Act tests: turnover not more than £10.2m, balance-sheet total not more than £5.1m, and not more than 50 employees. When the client is small, the off-payroll (Chapter 10) rules do not apply and responsibility for determining your IR35 status — and any tax — stays with your own limited company under Chapter 8.

Does my written contract or how I actually work matter more for IR35?

How you actually work usually wins. Following Autoclenz and confirmed in cases like Stuart Barnes, tribunals look through contract wording that does not reflect reality. A strong substitution or control clause carries little weight if, in practice, you must do the work personally and the client directs how you do it. The goal is alignment: your contract and your day-to-day working arrangements should tell the same story.

When must a client give me a Status Determination Statement (SDS), and how do I dispute one?

Under Chapter 10, a medium or large client must give you (and the next party in the chain) a Status Determination Statement with reasons before the work starts, and take reasonable care in reaching it. If you disagree, you can raise a formal dispute; the client then has 45 days to either issue a revised SDS or confirm the original with reasons. Until they respond, the original determination stands, so keep working and gather your evidence.

How can I strengthen an outside-IR35 position?

Make sure the contract and the reality match: a genuine, unfettered right of substitution; no obligation on the client to offer work or on you to accept it; control over how, when and where you work; real financial risk (fixed-price work, rectifying defects at your own cost, your own equipment and insurance); and clear signs you are in business on your own account, such as multiple clients, your own marketing and not being integrated into the client's team. Keep dated evidence — contracts, a confirmation of arrangements, and records of how you actually operate.

Does Making Tax Digital for Income Tax (MTD for ITSA) apply to my limited-company contractor income?

Not the company income itself. MTD for ITSA applies to sole traders and landlords with qualifying self-employment or property income above the threshold (£50,000 from April 2026, £30,000 from April 2027, £20,000 from April 2028). Salary and dividends you take from your own limited company do not count towards that threshold, so a contractor working purely through a Ltd company is generally out of scope — but any sole-trader or rental income alongside it can bring you in.

Ready to know where you stand?

Get a barrister-grade IR35 verdict in minutes — scored against all five HMRC factors and reviewed by Orion.

Run your IR35 assessment

New to IR35? Start with the plain-English explainer → — no jargon, just the five things HMRC actually checks.