Inside or outside IR35, with the case law that says so.
Answer 10 plain-English questions. We weigh all five HMRC factors — including mutuality of obligation, which HMRC's own CEST tool does not ask about — and give you a clear inside/outside verdict in minutes, reasoning included.
10 questions · verdict + confidence · all five factor names · no card, no login.
Check my status freeEverything in Free, plus contract clause analysis, dual-model deliberation and a downloadable status assessment PDF.
A specialist contract review costs £50–£130+VAT. This is £9.99.
Get the full report — £9.99IR35 by role: IT Contractors · Locum Doctors · Management Consultants · Interim Managers
Not a contractor? Agencies and end clients have their own, or see everything the hub does.
- 1You answer 10 plain questions
- 2Weighed against 18 UK tribunal rulings
- 3Verdict, with how sure it is
An illustrative result only — not a real assessment. See the full sample report
leading UK tribunal rulings we reference
HMRC Employment Status Manual paragraphs referenced
HMRC factors weighed, with the reasoning for each
free check — no card, no login
Nebula IR35 is built and reviewed by Hiep Do, FCCA, MSc — a qualified accountant — and grounded in HMRC's Employment Status Manual and UK tribunal case law. The methodology is published and explained on every result, not a black box.
- HMRC v RALC Consulting Ltd [2024] UKUT 99 (TCC)
- HMRC v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29
- Gary Lineker & Anor t/a Gary Lineker Media v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 340 (TC)
- Kickabout Productions Ltd v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 502
- HMRC v Atholl House Productions Ltd (Kaye Adams) [2022] EWCA Civ 501
- Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5
- Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine [2021] EWCA Civ 1514
- Northern Light Solutions Ltd v HMRC [2021] UKUT 134 (TCC)
- Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith [2018] UKSC 29
- Christa Ackroyd Media Ltd v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 69 (TC)
- JLJ Services Ltd (Marlen) v HMRC [2011] UKFTT TC01612
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and others [2011] UKSC 41
- Dragonfly Consulting Ltd v HMRC [2008] EWHC 2113 (Ch)
- Cornwall County Council v Prater [2006] EWCA Civ 102
- Express & Echo Publications Ltd v Tanton [1999] ICR 693
- Carmichael and another v National Power plc [1999] 1 WLR 2042
- Hall (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer [1994] ICR 218 (CA)
- Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497
An honest look at your options
Category-level, not against any one provider — here's where an AI check, HMRC's free CEST tool and a traditional specialist review actually differ.
- Price
- £0 check · £9.99 full report
- Speed
- Instant — minutes
- All five HMRC factors
- Yes
- Mutuality of Obligation
- Weighed in full
- “Unable to determine” outcome
- Verdict, or a flagged borderline
- Confidence shown per factor
- Yes
- Grounded in UK tribunal case law
- 18 rulings, incl. PGMOL
- Borderline flagged for specialist advice
- Auto-flagged
- Signed, dated status assessment PDF
- Yes (£9.99)
- No card / no login to start
- Yes
- Price
- Free
- Speed
- Instant
- All five HMRC factors
- Yes
- Mutuality of Obligation
- Omits MOO
- “Unable to determine” outcome
- ~1 in 5 engagements¹
- Confidence shown per factor
- No
- Grounded in UK tribunal case law
- No
- Borderline flagged for specialist advice
- No
- Signed, dated status assessment PDF
- Self-print only
- No card / no login to start
- Yes
- Price
- £50–£130 +VAT
- Speed
- Days to weeks
- All five HMRC factors
- Yes
- Mutuality of Obligation
- Yes
- “Unable to determine” outcome
- n/a
- Confidence shown per factor
- Varies
- Grounded in UK tribunal case law
- Yes
- Borderline flagged for specialist advice
- It is the human
- Signed, dated status assessment PDF
- Usually
- No card / no login to start
- No
¹ HMRC's CEST tool returns “unable to determine” on roughly one in five engagements (HMRC published CEST usage data). Important: HMRC states that it will stand by a CEST result where the information given is accurate and in line with its guidance — that backing applies to CEST and not to Nebula, or to any other third-party tool. Comparison is category-level — against HMRC's free tool and a typical specialist contract review, not any one provider. No IR35 determination is legally binding.
How our IR35 hub works
We combine an automated review with a clear steer to seek human review on borderline cases. You answer a set of plain questions that take a 360° view of your contract and your real working practices, and Nebula's engine weighs them the same way HMRC and the UK tax tribunals do. Most contractors get an instant verdict.
You answer a few plain questions
About how you really work day to day — who decides what you do, whether you could send someone else, what kit you use. No tax jargon, and about two minutes.
We weigh all five factors
It scores you on the five things HMRC uses to tell employment from self-employment, using how real tax tribunals have actually ruled — not a black box, and not guesswork.
Close call? We say so, and tell you to get a specialist
If your result is near the line, we flag it and recommend you have a qualified IR35 specialist review it before you rely on it. The engine tells you how sure it is, and says so when it isn't sure enough. Nobody at Nebula reviews it for you.
You get a clear answer to keep
A plain “inside” or “outside” verdict in minutes. Upgrade and you also get a signed status statement you can show your client, agency or accountant.
What you get for £9.99
The free check scores 10 questions and gives you a verdict. The full assessment asks 43, reads the contract you upload, and produces a dated PDF you can hand to a client, an agency or an accountant.
A specialist contract review costs £50–£130+VAT. This is £9.99.
Your contract, read clause by clause
Upload the contract and the engine pulls out the clauses that help your status and the ones that hurt it, quoting the wording it relied on.
A score for every one of the five factors
Not one verdict, but where you stand on substitution, control, mutuality, financial risk and being in business on your own account — separately, each with its own confidence.
Two models, then a reconciliation
Two models assess the engagement independently. Where they disagree, the report shows the disagreement rather than hiding it behind one confident-sounding number.
A dated PDF, with a declaration you sign yourself
You type your name against a declaration and it prints on the document. Your signature, not ours — it is your statement about how you actually work — re-issued whenever you re-run the engagement.
Also in it: suggested rewrites for the clauses doing you damage, a CEST cross-check showing how HMRC's own tool would be likely to treat the same engagement, the full reasoning tied back to the tribunal rulings behind it, and an audit trail of who was assessed, on which answers, on what day.
Assessed by automated processing, including AI models — no human reviews the result before you see it. Borderline results are flagged with a recommendation to have a qualified IR35 specialist review them.
Why you can trust your result
An IR35 decision affects your take-home pay and your tax risk, so we don't ask you to take it on faith — here's exactly what your result is built on.
No accuracy percentage, because nobody audits one
Plenty of tools quote a number. There is no independent body certifying IR35 accuracy, so any figure is self-declared. We publish none, name our limits instead, and tell you when a case is too close to call.
Grounded in real tribunals
Informed by the leading UK IR35 cases — PGMOL [2024] UKSC 29, Atholl House [2022] EWCA Civ 501, Tanton, Autoclenz and Hall v Lorimer — plus HMRC's ESM manual. Every factor is scored against how those cases were actually decided.
Honest about how sure it is
Every result shows a confidence level for each of the five factors. If the engine isn't sure enough, it says so and recommends a qualified IR35 specialist rather than guessing.
Your answers stay yours
No ad-tech, no cross-site tracking, and we never sell your data. Our own page analytics only run if you accept optional cookies (fonts load from a CDN that sets no cookies). Your answers and contract are used only to produce your result and your status assessment — and you can delete them anytime.
IR35 questions, answered
Tap any question to expand. Contracting in a specific field? See how IR35 plays out by role, or read the full IR35 guide.
Is my IR35 result legally binding?
What Nebula gives you is your reasoning and the case law we referenced: your result, your factor-by-factor reasoning, and the tribunal precedents we drew on — the kind of evidence HMRC asks to see if your status is ever challenged. Borderline results are clearly flagged with a recommendation to have a qualified IR35 specialist review them before you act on them. Nebula is not your tax or legal advisor; you remain responsible for taking reasonable care over your status.
What is Nebula IR35?
How do I know if I'm inside or outside IR35?
Is the IR35 status check really free?
Does Nebula produce a Status Determination Statement (SDS)?
How is this different from HMRC's CEST tool?
What happens if HMRC challenges my IR35 status?
How much does this cost compared to other IR35 providers?
Know where you stand on IR35 — inside or outside, in minutes.
Free five-factor score in minutes — no card, no login. Upgrade to a signed, dated status assessment with the tribunal reasoning behind it whenever you're ready.
No card · No login · No ad-tech